posted: 2008-10-04 08:10:26 perma-link, RSS comments feed
My Slicehost machine ran out disk space yesterday, so I was looking for logs to rotate, files to delete, etc and I ran across a few large groups of files that I wanted to keep. I tried gzip -9 like always, but then found myself wondering if I could get these files any smaller. A quick google turned me on to rzip. But as it turns out, rzip is extremely memory intensive and was completely consuming everything I had on this poor slice.
I could go though all of the files trying to decide which ones I really wanted, but that seemed like it would take too long. In the end, I fired up an ec2 instance on Amazon's Web Services, moved the files over, rzipped them there, moved the results back and reclaimed about a gig of disk space. It only took a few minutes, and cost me $0.14 from amazon.
That's just crazy. I wonder how long we have before that just becomes common practice.
Brian commented, on October 20, 2008 at 9:41 p.m.:
I use bzip2 - usually better compression depending upon the type of file.
|
Based upon your reading habits, might I recommend:
Our search engine suggests Reversed publishing with Django for django. |
hosting: slicehost.com.
powered by: django.
written in: python.
controlled by: bzr.
monsters by: monsterID.
You've been exposed to: {'Life': 1.1858667377260734, 'Business': 2.3771332839963097, 'Science & Technology': 1.5094481272952054, 'The Net': 1.3642065800953234, 'Programming': 1.3616438024262021, 'Piss & Moan': 0.63294236126643511, 'Obsession': 0.00063971009062573569, 'Cool': 0.54823800450422799}
cliffe commented, on October 5, 2008 at 10:06 p.m.:
Brilliant! This made me think of the future :)